
Define failure!
Our efforts to repair these fractures may fail in many ways. Complications are forms of failure - re-fracture, implant failure and infection for example. Their significance depends on how they compromise bone healing and functional outcomes. They may, but do not always, lead to delayed, non- or mal-union, and associated poor function. Failure can be temporary – complications may be managed, ultimately leading to union and acceptable functional outcome. True failure probably means complications that cannot be, or are not managed, and a catastrophic outcome such as persistent significant lameness, amputation or euthanasia.
Re-fracture, implant failure and infection
A recent study of radius/ulna fractures in small breed dogs found re-fracture occurred in 3.5% of dogs at the distal screw hole of bone plates left in situ, after fracture union. Where the bone plate was removed, 12.5% re-fractured at the original fracture site1. The best strategy for managing re-fracture will depend in part on the location within the bone. Those at the level of a distal screw hole can be challenging because of limited distal bone stock. Trans-articular external skeletal fixation may be useful where it is not possible to revise with plate fixation. Reducing the screw size distally may help prevent this complication1. The significance of implant failure, and the requirement for revision, depends on concomitant complications such as infection, as well as bone healing outcome and function. Infection may be a rare cause of non-union: Two data sets did not contain any infections from a combined total of 122 toy breed radius and ulna fractures2,3. One case report does describe management of infection with oral antimicrobials prior to debridement, stabilisation and grafting in a single procedure4. Staged debridement and definitive stabilisation can also be considered.
Delayed, mal- and non-union
Delayed union is not failure, as union is achieved, albeit slower than expected. Mal-union is failure where it causes significant lameness, but revision to correct the deformity is possible. Non-union is probably to many surgeons almost synonymous with failure, but again all is not lost! If the principles of managing infection, stabilizing and grafting are followed, non-unions may of course be successfully treated, with dogs returning to full or acceptable function in the long term5. The type of stabilization and graft have been the subject of recent publications. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 is a popular osteoinductive agent for managing non-union in toy breeds, typically combined with internal fixation4,5. Good outcomes have also been shown recently with traditional corticocancellous grafting and circular external skeletal fixation, and with a novel caudal vertebral autograft6,7. Finally, for severe radial atrophy in a toy poodle, a novel centralisation technique has been described, transposing distal radius to osteotomised ulna, with a good outcome8.
References