Because of the size and weight of equine viscera, secure closure of the surgical wound is imperative. Furthermore, the closure should minimize incisional complications such as suture dehiscence, wound secretion/infection and abdominal hernia formation. Reported incisional complication rates vary from 3.9 % to 62 %. There is conflicting evidence that the number of layers in the celiotomy closure could influence linea alba incision healing and surgical incisional complications.
The Anglo-Saxon world merely supports the opinion that the closure of the peritoneum is not mandatory. The latest edition of the standard textbook “The Equine Acute Abdomen” (1) still reports the idea that the suture of the peritoneum may lead to enhanced rates of intra-abdominal adhesions. This derives from an experimental study (2) dating from 1973 which investigated the effect of suturing the peritoneum. A closer look at the original paper reveals that there was no significant difference between the groups concerning frequency of adhesion formation at the level of the median laparotomy wound, and that the suture had been performed using non-absorbable suture (Mersilene No. 2). The conclusion drawn from that study (2), namely that the suture of the peritoneum is harmful, should be revised. There is one study investigating the influence of the suture of the peritoneum on the development of incisional complications, demonstrating the beneficial influence of the suture of the peritoneum. The incisional complication rate was 3.9 % in horses having had suture of the peritoneum, while horses not having had suture of the peritoneum exhibited a significantly higher proportion (24 %) of patients developing incisional complications (3).
Closure of the linea alba with a simple continuous pattern is common because it is convenient, fast and has superior bursting strength compared to an interrupted cruciate pattern measured in a cadaver study (4). However, two retrospective studies have effectively used interrupted pattern in the linea alba with incisional complication rates of 4.29 % (5) and 9.52 % (6). In another cadaver study comparing suture materials, polydioxanone No. 7 had a higher bursting strength than polyglactin 910 No. 2 (7). In a retrospective study, the occurrence of incisional complications after closure with polydioxanone No. 7 was 25.3 % (8).
Closure of the subcutaneous tissue was reported in two study to decrease the risk of incisional complications (9, 10). In contrast to this finding, Coomer et al. (11) could not identify significant differences between techniques including or excluding the subcutaneous layer. These authors therefore, recommend a two layer suture technique, including sutures of the linea alba and skin only to close a laparotomy wound. However, the overall wound healing complication frequency of 21.4 % in this study was quite high. A modified subcuticular pattern that incorporates both the skin and subcutaneous tissue into one layer was reported to decrease the risk of incisional complications compared to closing three separate layers (12). In a prospective randomized study, antibacterial-coated suture material for subcutaneous closure did not decrease the likelihood of incisional complications (13).
Closure of the skin can be performed using absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials or skin staples. The use of skin staples was associated with enhanced risk of developing wound infection (14). Subcuticular absorbable staples were used with superior wound scores compared to conventional skin staples. In this prospective randomized study no surgical site infections were identified (15). However, subcuticular absorbable staples had the lowest ultimate failure load compare with metallic staples, nylon and polyglyconate suture (16). In a retrospective study, the occurrence of incisional complications did not differ between skin closure with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (15.9 %) or skin staples (19.1 %) (17). A prospective randomized study compared skin closures using a simple continuous versus an intradermal pattern. The overall prevalence of incisional complications was 9.5 % without statistically significant differences between both groups, but none of the animals in the intradermal suture pattern group developed incisional complications (18). Another prospective randomized study compared the zip skin closure system with conventional suture for skin closure in 8 horses. At 14 days postoperatively, the cosmetic appearance using the zip skin closure system was better than using sutured closure. Major incisional complications were found in 2 horses in the conventional suture group and none in the zip skin closure system group (19).
We recommend four layer closure: peritoneum, linea alba and subcutaneous tissue in a simple continuous pattern, and skin in an intradermal pattern.
References